<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cross browser testing made EASY!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rukispot.com/cross-browser-testing-made-easy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rukispot.com/cross-browser-testing-made-easy/</link>
	<description>just my two cents</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 23:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Les</title>
		<link>http://www.rukispot.com/cross-browser-testing-made-easy/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Les</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 05:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rukispot.com/cross-browser-testing-made-easy/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Just a little note about cross browser testing. browsershots.org might be good just to see how it looks, but I launched a web site and forgot to test for specifically IE6.

So 50% of the all visitors were using from IE6 yet not only did some of the elements look bad, but the buttons did not work.

You can't test for all of the browsers but keep an eye on your traffic and test the major ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a little note about cross browser testing. browsershots.org might be good just to see how it looks, but I launched a web site and forgot to test for specifically IE6.</p>
<p>So 50% of the all visitors were using from IE6 yet not only did some of the elements look bad, but the buttons did not work.</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t test for all of the browsers but keep an eye on your traffic and test the major ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
